Company In Greg Is Working Could Deliver †Myassignmethelp.Com

Questions: What's going on? What are the facts? What are the issues? Who is affected? What are the ethical issues and their implications? What could have been done about it? What are the options? Which option is the best and why? Answers: 1.The CIA was asked if the company in which Greg is working could deliver the project before the allocated time. Greg is the project manager of the company (YouTube, 2017). The CEO if the company had demanded the project manager to complete the project before the allocated time, but this would be impossible as it is not possible to implement the encryption system within the project in such a short time and this would decrease the effectiveness of the system. 2.The CEO of the company is demanding that Willis project is to be submitted before the deadline and also it is said that the project would not be accepted by the Willis Company if it is not completed within the demand of the company. The CEO also says that the contract is worth over 3 million and that the project manager if required should deliver the project without the encryption enabled within the project, but the project manager says that the senior developer of the company has expressed that delivering the project without the encryption would hamper the project and would result in the security of the project being neglected. However the Gregs senior is adamant that the project management be submitted on the deadline that they are requested to if needed without the encryption and also says that they can implement it later in the system if required. 3.There are two types of issues that would arise from this situation (Wouters et al., 2014). The ethical issues are: The company was not made aware that they are not provided with the encryption feature in their project. The unethical issues are: The project could face security issues. In addition to this, the project would be incomplete and would be lacking efficiency. 4.The main stakeholders that would be affected due to this project are (Dilling Berggren, 2015): The CEO of the company: The CEO of the company would be in danger as he would be blamed for the efficiency in the project if the company finds this. The Willis Company would face difficulties due to the inefficiency in the project. The employees of the Willis Company Would also suffer due to the security issues in the project. The staffs in CIA would also be accused for hiding the details of the project. 5.The main ethical issue that arises in this situation is the issue to security that the CIA Company is not providing to the Willis Company. This would give rise to the ethical inefficiencies and would also be violating the classical ethical theories (Caroll Bucholtz, 2014). The company that provides the project to the Willis Company did not perform their duty of providing security to the company; hence the deontological theory is violated in this situation (Paquette, Somerfeldt Kent, 2015). In addition to this, the incomplete project would also hamper a large number of staffs of the company and hence, the utilitarianism theory would be violated by this project (Goetghbeur et al., 2015). In addition to this, the senior of the project manager was seen to be pursuing his subordinate to complete the project without the encryptions enabled in it and this represents the moral characteristics of the person and this violates the virtue ethics in the classical ethical theory. 6.For the resolution of the situation the project manager needs to be determined and make decisions so that they can complete the project and implement the encryption system in the project. This would be providing the system with the efficient Accounting of security that is required by the system. 7.For the resolution of the situation the following options would be available to the project manager: He could stall the progress of the project until the encryption system is implemented in the project. He could talk directly with the CEO of the company and try and negotiate the timeline of the project with him. He can also ask for the arrangement of a meeting in between him and a fellow representative of the Willis Company so that he a site the problems regarding the project and request for extension directly. He can also try and convince his senior so that he can convey the messages to the CEO and make them understand the situation. 8.The option of talking directly to the CEO is the efficient options as in this kind of situation where the senior is very bossy and is trying to manipulate his subordinates into wrong paths the best method is to report directly to the higher official. The project manager can make the CEO understand the consequences of the situation. References Carroll, A., Buchholtz, A. (2014).Business and society: Ethics, sustainability, and stakeholder management. Nelson Education. Dilling, L., Berggren, J. (2015). What do stakeholders need to manage for climate change and variability? A document-based analysis from three mountain states in the Western USA.Regional Environmental Change,15(4), 657-667. Goetghebeur, M. M., Wagner, M., Bond, K., Hofmann, B. (2015). Analysis Of Ethical Theories And Principles Embedded In Holistic Mcda: A Primer To Ethics-Based Appraisal Of Value In Healthcare.Value in Health,18(3), A101. Paquette, M., Sommerfeldt, E. J., Kent, M. L. (2015). Do the ends justify the means? Dialogue, development communication, and deontological ethics.Public Relations Review,41(1), 30-39. Wouters, K., Maesschalck, J., Peeters, C. F., Roosen, M. (2014). Methodological issues in the design of online surveys for measuring unethical work behavior: Recommendations on the basis of a split-ballot experiment.Journal of Business Ethics,120(2), 275-289. YouTube. (2017).Scenario 3: Early Launch. [online] Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5M7ohdZ6qA [Accessed 8 Aug. 2017].